Yes, you can put on a surgical mask that has already been worn: just keep it for at least seven days before reusing it, preferably in a paper envelope. Reusing masks reduces waste and unnecessary expenses during the pandemic. COVID-19.
During the outbreak of COVID, you can reuse your surgical masks for yourself: between two uses, you just need to store your mask for a week in a paper envelope, while the coronaviruses that may be present on the mask are practically all inactivated.
Why reuse surgical masks?
- less pollution. These masks are made of plastic nanofibers. This plastic is not biodegradable and takes several hundred years to degrade. In all countries of the world, these masks can be found in garbage cans, streets and gardens, rivers and oceans. These masks are very ugly, dangerous for the animals that ingest them, and end up in the form of microplastics, a huge pollution whose dangers for the environment are still poorly known. If every person in France uses a single-use mask every day for a year, this creates about 100,000 tons of non-recyclable plastic waste in one year.
- less use of petroleum, necessary for the production of the polypropylene for the masks.
- less expenses: a box of 50 masks is enough for 2-3 people for one year.
- less out-of-country purchases: the majority of masks come from Asia.
- less risk of contamination from used masks, which are often thrown out outside.
Why is this reuse not officially recommended?
These surgical masks were designed in the 1960s for single use in a hospital environment under conditions of strict asepsis. Surgeons and nurses wear them to avoid contaminating the operating field, and not to infect the patient on the operating table with their saliva. The masks were sterile and were discarded after each operation.
It is with the COVID-19 pandemic (shortage of masks at the beginning, then massive consumption of surgical masks by the general public) that the issue of their recycling has become major. Nevertheless, governments and health authorities may fear the use of contaminated masks, and exchanges between users. In addition, manufacturers and retailers have an interest in selling as many masks as possible.
What is the evidence that this method is effective?
The method we propose is effective, but not absolutely: it does not clean dirty masks and does not sterilize them, and in case of massive contamination by coronavirus, some viruses may remain.
At room temperature, coronaviruses gradually lose their infecting power. On ordinary plastic this virus only survives for four days. On a mask experimentally contaminated with a high viral load, 99.9% to 99.99% of the coronaviruses SARS-CoV-2 are inactive after 7 days on the outside and 4 days on the inside. On the seventh day, between 0.01% and 0.1% of the starting viruses can still be extracted by washing the fibres.
We believe, however, that on a lightly contaminated mask there will be almost no virus left after 7 days, and that if any virus remains, it is strongly bound to the mask fibres by electrostatic attraction. Finally, the particles on the front of the mask cannot pass through it and therefore cannot be sucked in by the wearer of the mask. This reasoning is logical, and based on scientific data, but it does not guarantee the absolute effectiveness of the proposed method, which has never been rigorously tested with volunteers.
How do you do it in practice, concretely?
We are only talking here about the method with the paper envelopes, which is the simplest and most practical. Members of our team have been using it for several months. For the other methods (dry heat, steam, disinfectant), see the question Can a mask be reused?
- After use, simply store the mask in a paper envelope and wait a week before reusing it.
- Reuse only intact masks: no stains, holes nor tears, intact elastics, correct nose bridge.
- Wash your hands after storing the mask.
- Choose paper enveloppes instead of glossy paper envelopes (brown or plain white envelopes).
- Write the date onto the envelope, so as not to take it back too quickly, and keep a record of how many times each mask has been used.
- The envelopes can be re-used: after wearing it, the mask is put back in the same envelope.
- Make a stack of enveloppes by always placing the envelope of the last mask used under the stack, and using the decontaminated masks on top of the stack.
- Decontamination can be speeded up by exposing the envelopes and masks to temperatures above 25°C. The hotter it gets, the faster the virus is killed. On a radiator or in a black folder in the sun behind glass, if the temperature reaches 37°C, each day deactivates 99.9% of the virus. In an oven at 70°C, it will only take an hour.
Why storing masks in a paper envelope and not a plastic one?
- Paper decontaminates quickly. Within 30 minutes, 99% of the viruses have disappeared from the paper, and none remain after 3 hours. On plastic viruses persist for 4 days.
- The paper absorbs moisture and speeds up the drying of the mask.
- The rigidity of the envelope allows the mask to be smoothed out, preventing folds, fibre breakage and the appearance of small holes and tears.
- The paper is convenient for writing the date. Masks could also be hung on a hook or a coat hanger, but this would lose traceability and may result in a risk of contamination through contact.
- Storing the masks flat in a stack is convenient when running on more than seven masks. This is the case when using several masks per day.
How many times can you recycle your mask in this way?
The filtration power of surgical masks hardly changes after being worn (if they do not get wet), nor after being stored dry at room temperature, because filtration is based on the mesh of the fibres and its electrostatic properties. After 30 uses, the loss of filtration and fit to the face makes the surgical mask comparable to a new fabric mask. Therefore, if one is careful, and the mask is not splashed, one can keep the mask for a very long time, and recycle it at least 20 or 30 times, allowing more than six months of use. But you can choose to renew your masks more often.
Can you wash your surgical mask or disinfect it?
Washing the surgical mask or disinfecting it with alcohol greatly reduces its filtration capacity, cancelling out the electrostatic properties. Likewise, heating the mask too hard or too long degrades it, although it can withstand 70°C for one hour.
Is this method as effective for FFP2/N95 masks?
Yes, the envelope method also works with FFP2 masks, especially the duck beaks that can be flattened into envelopes.
In conclusion, this efficient and economical method is simple enough to be used in practice for a long time. It is not risky, because the same person will always use the recycled masks, which cancels out the risk of transmitting germs other than coronaviruses. It is not ideal, since it does not guarantee total disinfection of the masks, but it is better than what many people do when they use their cloth masks as a cotton handkerchief: folded in the pocket, sometimes damp, taken out and put away many times without washing hands, and washed only when it is visibly too dirty to wear.
- In cases where you think your mask may be heavily contaminated (intensive care unit, conversation with a patient or contact, large gatherings, visible soiling), it is best to discard the mask. Indeed, if the initial contamination is massive, the viral particles may not all be inactivated in 7 days.
- In cases where your mask has been wet, it should be dried carefully, either in open air or in a porous envelope (blotting paper), but not under the stack of enveloppes. In theory, a wet mask can allow the development of germs that are dangerous for an immunocompromised wearer (e.g. Aspergillus). After drying, the mask will have lost some of its filtering power, but it will still be more effective than a cloth mask.
- If you are particularly fragile or immunosuppressed, it is prudent to continue to discard your masks and use a new one each time. The same advice applies to caregivers who come into contact with these people.
- Don’t share your masks with others. Everyone keeps their own germs to avoid contamination between people!
- Do not store the mask in the cold: the coronavirus can survive for a long time at 4°C, and even longer at -18°C in the freezer.
- If you have any doubts, throw away your surgical mask.
Republication from : https://en.adioscorona.org
- A rigorous study shows that seven days after five hundred thousand viruses have been deposited on a mask, the virus is undetectable on the inner layer (mouth side). On the other hand, washing the outer layer of the mask reveals 0.1% of the viruses. On paper, no virus is detectable three hours after deposit of coronaviruses. This study also shows that the virus does not survive two days at 37°C and not 30 minutes at 56°C.
- Chin, A., Chu, J., Perera, M., Hui, K., Yen, H. L., Chan, M., … & Poon, L. (2020). Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in different environmental conditions. The Lancet Microbe.
- Another scientific study that shows that 99.99% of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is deactivated after 7 days on a surgical mask.
- Liu, Y., Li, T., Deng, Y., Liu, S., Zhang, D., Li, H., … & Zhou, Y. (2020). Stability of SARS-CoV-2 on environmental surfaces and in human excreta. medRxiv.
- This study shows that the virus SARS-CoV-2 only survives 4 days on plastic.
- van Doremalen, N., Bushmaker, T., Morris, D. H., Holbrook, M. G., Gamble, A., Williamson, B. N., … & Lloyd-Smith, J. O. (2020). Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. New England Journal of Medicine.
- This study shows that the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus does not survive five days when left to dry on a glass plate at 20-25°C. At 37°C the virus dried on glass doesn’t even survive 24 hours.
- Chan, K. H., Sridhar, S., Zhang, R. R., Chu, H., Fung, A. F., Chan, G., … & Yuen, K. Y. (2020). Factors affecting stability and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Hospital Infection, 106(2), 226-231.
- Ninety million masks per month are needed by health workers to control the epidemic of COVID-19, according to WHO estimates (March 2020). This estimate does not take into account the use of masks by the general population.
- World Health Organization. (2020). Shortage of personal protective equipment endangering health workers worldwide. Newsroom, March, 3, 2020.
- A University College London working group has estimated that the current demand for masks in the UK is 24.7 billion masks per year. If every person in the UK uses a single-use mask every day for one year, this will create 123,000 tonnes of non-recyclable plastic waste.
- Report of UCL Plastic Waste Innovation Hub. The environmental dangers of employing single-useface masks as part of a COVID-19 exit strategy.
- The release of a huge number of plastic surgical masks into the environment is leading to an unprecedented phenomenon of visual, biological and chemical pollution on a global scale, in all ecosystems. It is in marine environments that the impact of microplastics is likely to be most harmful.
- Aragaw, T. A. (2020). Surgical face masks as a potential source for microplastic pollution in the COVID-19 scenario. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 159, 111517.
- A well illustrated article showing the challenge posed by the release of billions of disposable masks into the environment. The consequences of these discharges are evoked, in particular the increase in microplastics content in the oceans. These microplastics are a threat to marine fauna, and a possible source of poisoning and infection for people.
- Fadare, O. O., & Okoffo, E. D. (2020). Covid-19 face masks: A potential source of microplastic fibers in the environment. The Science of the total environment, 737, 140279.
- This non-scientific article, among many others, denounces the ugliness and danger of masks spread in the environment. It talks about the many surgical masks found in the Mediterranean Sea and on the beaches of the Soko Islands in Hong Kong. Turtles and dolphins can mistake them for food, choke and die.
- Kassam, A. More masks than jellyfish’: coronavirus waste ends up in ocean. 8 June 2020. Article in The Guardian.
- Dry heat at 80°C for one hour does not significantly reduce the filtration capacity, breathability, elasticity of the straps and the shape of FFR respirators, even after 20 cycles. All the more reason to believe that at room temperature the qualities of surgical masks, made of polypropylene like FFRs, do not diminish either.
- Viscusi, D. J., King, W. P., & Shaffer, R. E. (2007). Effect of Decontamination on the Filtration Efficiency of Two Filtering Facepiece Respirator Models. Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection, 2493.
- The filtering properties of N95 masks are not degraded by fifty 30-minute cycles at 85°. A fortiori, one can think that at room temperature the qualities of surgical masks, made of polypropylene like N95, do not diminish either.
- In times of mask shortage, the inventor of the N95 mask (equivalent to the FFP2 mask) advises doctors to use four masks in rotation over four days after marking them 1, 2, 3, and 4.
- Juang, P. S., & Tsai, P. (2020). N95 Respirator Cleaning and Reuse Methods Proposed by the Inventor of the N95 Mask Material. Journal of Emergency Medicine.
- This non-scientific article, among many others, suggests several ways to reuse a surgical mask. It quotes Michael Chang, an infectious disease specialist at the University Health Science Center in Houston, Texas. Chang suggests keeping the masks for four days in a permeable box before reusing them.
- Alix Couture, Reusing a surgical mask that’s been lying around, is that a good idea? Huffingtonpost SCIENCE 9/24/2020
- This scientific review describes several methods of mask decontamination, and describes three interesting facts about the envelope mask method. – The use of a seven-day rotation system is proposed, with seven different masks that have time to dry and decontaminate. – The filtration efficiency and air permeability of N95 masks does not change after being worn for 8 consecutive hours by volunteers. – A surgical mask washed for 2 min with soap and water loses half of its filtering power, but is still more filtering than a cloth mask.
- Tsai, P. (2020). Performance of masks and discussion of the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2. Engineered Science, 10(2), 1-7.
- This study shows that the static charges of the polypropylene electret of a surgical mask are cancelled out by immersion in water at 56°C for 30 minutes, but are partially restored by air drying: the mask then regains 60% of the charges of a new mask, and probably 60% of the filtration efficiency.
- Wang, D., Sun, B. C., Wang, J. X., Zhou, Y. Y., Chen, Z. W., Fang, Y., … & Chu, G. W. (2020). Can Masks Be Reused After Hot Water Decontamination During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Engineering.
- Reuse of the surgical mask has very little effect on its filtration rate. After 3 cycles of 4 hours, filtration is still >90% and well above the fabric mask. The variation in filtration seen in these data is a loss of about 0.3 points per use and 0.3 points per heat sterilization. After 30 uses or sterilizations, surgical masks should therefore lose 9 filtration points, remaining higher than new fabric masks.
- Song, W., Pan, B., Kan, H., Xu, Y., & Yi, Z. (2020). Heat inactivating and reusing of virus-contaminated disposable medical mask. medRxiv.
- A laboratory evaluation of the short-term use of N95 masks once a week over several months, simulating use with a spray containing a 5 mg salt solution and storage in office conditions.
- Moyer, E. S., & Bergman, M. S. (2000). Electrostatic N-95 respirator filter media efficiency degradation resulting from intermittent sodium chloride aerosol exposure. Applied occupational and environmental hygiene, 15(8), 600-608.
- Three models of surgical masks were put on for a few minutes and taken off 20 times, and the fit was tested each time. The median fit of the masks decreases linearly but remains above 100, which is a good fit. It can be extrapolated that the median reaches 100 after 30 uses.
- Bergman, M. S., Viscusi, D. J., Zhuang, Z., Palmiero, A. J., Powell, J. B., & Shaffer, R. E. (2012). Impact of multiple consecutive donnings on filtering facepiece respirator fit. American journal of infection control, 40(4), 375-380.